A Research Agenda for Administrative Law
In: Elgar research agendas
45 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Elgar research agendas
In: European Governance Papers No. C-06-02
In: Understanding law series
In: Clarendon law lectures
In: EUI working papers / Robert Schuman Centre, 98,23
World Affairs Online
In: EUI working papers / Robert Schuman Centre, 96,62
World Affairs Online
In: Jean Monnet Chair papers 27
It is widely acknowledged that the contextual study of European Community law, later European Union law, has contributed to a richer understanding of EC/EU law. This review proposes a contextual reconstruction and analysis of EC/EU law in context, or what is the same, it considers the institutions, milieus and debates which fostered the analysis and assessment of EC and EU law as 'an intricate web of politics, economics and law', at the same time that facilitated the development of critical self-consciousness about the underlying assumptions that scholars (including contextual scholars) bring to their study of law. This is done by engaging with the work of Francis Snyder, and in particular, with his groundbreaking collection "New Directions in European Community law".
BASE
In: European journal of international law, Band 17, Heft 1, S. 187-214
ISSN: 1464-3596
In: European journal of international law, Band 17, Heft 1, S. 187-214
ISSN: 0938-5428
World Affairs Online
In: Revue internationale des sciences administratives: revue d'administration publique comparée, Band 71, Heft 2, S. 293-310
ISSN: 0303-965X
Résumé Cette communication examine, à la lumière des tensions historiques, certaines réponses données par le droit administratif classique aux nouvelles techniques d'administration publique. Nous rejetons le reproche habituel selon lequel le droit n'est pas sensible aux besoins des administrateurs publics, mais constatons l'existence d'une croyance répandue selon laquelle le contrôle et l'imputabilité sont les objectifs premiers du droit administratif. La réaction des administrateurs, dépassés par les modalités d'application, consiste à se replier sur des directives non-impératives. Nous verrons que ces directives non-impératives sont de plus en plus utilisées dans l'Union européenne, de même que certaines techniques de gouvernance plus abstraites. Nous constaterons aussi une convergence possible des valeurs juridiques et administratives, tandis que les tribunaux édictent et font appliquer des normes de « bonne gouvernance » et des « principes de bonne administration » acceptables pour les deux parties. Tandis que les normes de « bonne gouvernance » sont diffusées par les institutions internationales et transnationales, cet article prévoit une forme similaire de tension et de fuite, à mesure que les systèmes de droit administratif axés sur la procédure et appliqués par les organismes juridictionnels transnationaux se développent pour occuper l'espace administratif global.
In: International review of administrative sciences: an international journal of comparative public administration, Band 71, Heft 2, S. 279-294
ISSN: 1461-7226
In the light of historical tensions, this article considers some classical administrative law responses to changing techniques of public administration. Rejecting the customary reproach that law is unresponsive to the needs of public administrators, the article nonetheless identifies a widespread conviction that control and accountability are the primary objectives of administrative law. The response of administrators overwhelmed by procedural requirements is to fall back on 'soft law' techniques. The article notes the growing use of 'soft law' and recourse to 'soft' techniques of governance in the European Union, together with a possible convergence of legal and administrative values, as standards of 'good governance' and 'principles of good administration' acceptable to both sides are promulgated and enforced by courts. As 'good governance' standards are disseminated by international and transnational institutions, the article predicts a similar pattern of tension and evasion, as procedurally oriented administrative law systems enforced by transnational adjudicative organs develop to occupy the global administrative space.